WebAug 27, 1997 · RCr 9.22. The circuit court incorrectly found reversible error in this regard. We similarly have no problem with the Commonwealth introducing evidence of the Horizontal … WebRCr 9.22 Objections, exceptions unnecessary Baldwin's Kentucky Revised Statutes Annotated Rules of Criminal Procedure Baldwin's Kentucky Revised Statutes Annotated

Renfro v. Com., 893 S.W.2d 795 – CourtListener.com

WebApr 24, 1997 · On appeal, the appellant raises forty-four assignments of alleged error as well as twenty seven sub-issues, many of which were not preserved for review pursuant to RCr 9.22 or 9.54. We have carefully reviewed all issues both preserved and unpreserved and for the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of conviction and the sentence … WebCatalogLCR-22. UPC7-36676-05410-7. Suggested Retail$739.00. Monolithic frame is made from aerospace-grade, 7000-series aluminum. Patented friction-reducing cam is a next … hikari architects

BERRY v. COMMONWEALTH (2001) FindLaw

WebGet free access to the complete judgment in RUSSELL v. COMMONWEALTH on CaseMine. WebRCr 9.22 requires a party to make "known to the court the action he desires the court to take or his objection to the action of the court." West v. Commonwealth,Ky., 780S.W.2d600, 602 (1989). Failure to comply with this rule renders an error unpreserved. Bowers v. Commonwealth,Ky., 555S.W.2d241(1977). WebJan 22, 2009 · RCr 9.36(1). “A determination as to whether to exclude a juror for cause lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and unless the action of the trial court is an abuse of discretion or is clearly erroneous, an appellate court will not reverse the trial court's determination.” Pendleton v. Commonwealth, 83 S.W.3d 522, 527 (Ky.2002). hikari architecten