Webb1 okt. 2008 · Just wars are supposed to be proportional responses to aggression: the costs of war must not greatly exceed the benefits. This proportionality principle raises a … WebbIt is argued here that weapons innovation always introduces costs, and that these costs cannot be determined in advance of going to war, so the proportionality principle is …
Essay on Discrimination and Proportionality in War
WebbThe principles of the justice of war are commonly held to be: having just cause, being a last resort, being declared by a proper authority, possessing right intention, having a … Webb1 jan. 2011 · Abstract According to a widespread view, the same constraints that limit the use of otherwise immoral measures in individual self-defense apply to collective self-defense too. I try to show that this view has radical implications at the level of jus in bello, implications which have not been fully appreciated. In particular, if the necessity … diagram high level
Proportionality in War: Revising Revisionism - RCNi Company …
Webb22 okt. 2024 · Proportionality: As for war, the harm that will foreseeably be caused by the economic sanctions must not be disproportionate to the good of achieving the just cause. 15 3. Right Intention: As for war, the intention of … WebbProportionality in modern just war theory: A tort-based approach. Davis Brown - 2011 - Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):213-229. The principle of proportionality revisited: … Webb23 sep. 2011 · This article lays a theoretical foundation the perspective of international law for applying the principle of proportionality of cause in modern just war theory. It proposes an analytical framework for measuring proportionality based on general tort law, filtered through the international law of state responsibility. diagram icon from text